Skip to main content

Chapter XI (32 - 55)

\
श्री भगवानुवाच -
कालोsस्मि लोकक्षयकृत् प्रवृद्धो लोकान्समाहर्तुमिह प्रवृत्तः
ऋतेsपि त्वां भविष्यन्ति सर्वे येsवस्थिताः प्रत्यनीकेषु योधाः ३२
तस्मात्त्वं उत्तिष्ठ यशो लभस्व जित्वा शत्रून् भुङ्क्ष्व राज्यं समृद्धम्
मयैवेते निहताः पूर्वमेव निमित्तमात्रं भव सव्यसाचिन् ३३
द्रोणञ्च भीष्मञ्च जयद्रथञ्च कर्णं तथान्यानपि योधवीरान्
मया हतांस्त्वं जहि मा व्यथिष्ठा युध्यस्व जेतासि रणे सपत्रान् ३४


The Blessed Lord said:  I am the mighty world-destroying Time, here made manifest for the purpose of infolding the world.  Even without thee, none of the warriors arrayed in the hostile armies shall live.  Therefore do thou arise and acquire fame.  Conquer the enemies, and enjoy the unrivalled dominion.  Verily by Myself have they been already slain;  be thou merely an apparent cause, Oh Savyasachin (Arjuna)!  Drona, Bheeshma, Jayadratha, Karna, as well as other brave warriors, - these already killed by Me, do thou kill.  Be not distressed with fear; fight, and thou shall conquer thy enemies in battle.
(XI – 32, 33, 34)

‘Who are You?’ Arjuna wanted to know.  “I am Mahaakaala” replies the Form.  ‘I do not know what You do’, said Arjuna.  “I gobble up the warriors on both sides” He replies.  He says His only work is to ‘cause death and destruction of all’.  ‘I will not fight’ argued Arjuna.  “Their end is definite, even if you refuse to fight.  In fact, they are already dead, finished by Me.”

The words ‘Definite’ ‘Destined’ may cause squirms in those who trust human effort, human potential, self-confidence, achievement in life, etc.  If everything is pre-destined, is there no scope, then, for these?  Is there nothing in human hands?  There are a few modern thinkers, who look at the ‘amazing’ development in western countries and lament that lack of progress in Bharat is mainly due to this philosophy.  “The west does not talk about God, Fate, etc.  See the progress they have achieved.  These talks on Dharma, God, destiny, etc. have made the Hindu lazy and inactive.  He has been rendered useless to himself as well to the society”, they complain.

It is true tht there are two opinions.  We are mere instruments.  Death is definite.  Malaria, Jaundice, bullet, etc. are mere excuses.  This is one idea.  Man can achieve anything.  Nothing is beyond his reach.  If only he is firm, if only he is determined, he can reach the sky.  This is the other idea.  The first idea is dominantly prevalent in eastern countries, especially Bharat and the second in western countries.

Do not know about other benefits, but the first outlook definitely ensures peace of mind.  Future is destined and hence there is no worry or anxiety.  The present moment is not lost in the anxiety about future.  Man has plenty of time to involve in art, music and other nicer things of the world.  Contentment level is high and crime level is low.  The innumerable Sadhus appearing in every generation here in Bharat, is chiefly due to the prevalence of this attitude.  At the visible level, there is poverty and disparity.  The poor also leads a contented and peaceful life.  The words aften heard here is, “why do you worry?  That which has to happen will happen”.

The first casualty of the other attitude is calm and peace of mind.  The future is not destined.  So, I have to create my future.  My future should be safe, protected, comfortable and happy.  Naturally,  anxiety, worry, disappointment and frustration are part of the package this outlook offers.  Activity level is high.  Exploitation also is high.  But, this attitude seems to have raised the level of comfortable living, at this moment.  What have the next fifty years to offer is uncertain.  Especially, the speed at which Nature is being exploited, squandered is a matter of concern.  “Why are you idle?  You must achieve.  Do not waste time.  Manage time to reach your goal of success”.  This is the oft repeated words in the society adopting this attitude.

A person was lying and resting under a tree in day time.  Another person saw him and said, “You seem to be lazy!  Don’t you have to work hard?”  “Why should I?” asked the former.  “To earn a lot of money” replied the later.  “Then what?”  “You can invest and start your own industry”.  “Then?”  “You can earn more money”.  “Then?”  “You can build you own house and be happy for the rest of your life”.  “That I am already now” said the person resting under the tree.

I saw a cartoon in a newmagazine.  It depicted our people hurrying in a direction.  There is another crowd of whites coming in the opposite direction.  The whites warn our people, “Please do not proceed further in this direction.  There are dangers ahead”  One of our men replies, “You have enjoyed everything.  Why do you stop us?  Are you jealous?”  This run towards ‘bright’ future has started in our country too.

We must become instrumental.  Decisions are His and may we be effective instruments for execution of His decisions.  We have two hands.  Are these two equal in potential?  Usually, one is more potent than the other.  Here, Shri Krishna calls Arjuna ‘Savyasachi’, the one who is equally adept with both his hands.  Like Arjuna’s, our hands too should be trained to be our efficient instruments.  Similarly, we must train ourselves to be His efficient instruments.

‘Victory in war is assured for you.  Hence, you must fight’ says Shri Krishna.  One who has firmly resolved and let things happen as per His wish, carries no worry or complaint about self, or people aroud or the world.  In such a state, he will never be involved in any wrong or vicious act.  He can never ever become an instrument in the hands of adharma.  (Only Complaining and discontented mind stimulates us to adopt shortcuts and vicious acts.)  He always is an instrument in the designs of Dharma.  Hence, his success is ensured.  “They are soaked in wickedness.  They have filled up their inner self with adharma.  They have to lose.  You are on the side of dharma, on the side of Paramaatman.  The Paramaatman is also on your sidde.  Hence, your victory is assured”.  ‘Yatho Dharma, tatho Jayam’.  Where there is Dharma, there is bound to be Victory.
-\-
सञ्जय उवाच -
एतच्छृत्वा वचनं केशवस्य कृताञ्जलिर्वेपमानः किरीटि
नमस्कृत्वा भूय एवाह कृष्णं सगद्गदं भीतभीतः प्रणम्य ३५

Sanjaya said:  Having heard speech of Keshava, the diademed one (Arjuna or Kireeti), with joined palms, trembling, prostrated himself, and agai addressed Krishna in a choked voice, bowing down, overwhelmed with fear.
(XI - 35)

Kireeti is one of the names of Arjuna.  Indra pleased at Arjuna’s valour in the battle against demons Kaala and Kunja, gifts him a dazzling crown.  Sanjaya is using that name to remind Dhritarashtra of Arjuna’s valour.  He wants the blind king to realize the strength of Shri Krishna by saying that Arjuna, so valourous, is terrorized by the Viraata Form of Shri Krishna.

Arjuna, already frightened by the vision of terrible Form, was all the more frightened when he heard It say, ‘I am Mahaakaal.  I am here to gobble up everyone’.  His body starts trembling.  ‘I can be saved from destruction only by Him’.  So thinking, Arjuna joins palms and bows down again and again to the Viraata Form.  He is struggling for words.  His voice is choked by excessive fear.  He overcomes fear to some extent and starts talking, nay starts praising Shri Krishna again.

Arjuna sees a future scene.  That is the scene of his achieving victory in the war.  The scene of death also appears along.  He is frightened and loses control over his tongue and voice.  In a way, we re fortunate that we are unaware of the future.  If only we could know our future, most of our actions and words would make us laugh at ourselves.  I had a friend, who was working whole time in a noble mission.  His father died.  ‘I wish to leave this work and help my distressed and lonely mother’ he said.  ‘Do not take a decision in haste or under the impact of mere emotion.  We do not know what is in store in future.  If you feel you have done enough of this work and want to go, it is OK.  Please do not fool yourself by thinking you are quitting this noble work for protecting your mother.’  He was adament and returned to his home.  Within one year, he fell in love with a girl and married.  There arose difference of opinion with his mother and he went away with his wife, took a house on rent and strted staying away from mother.  I met him after a gap of three years and asked if he was taking care of the mother.  He was embarrassed and remained silent.

Similarly, if the lovers could recall their passionate words exchanged ten years ago?  ‘Oh!  I can not remain alive a minute without you’.  If he foresee the incidents destined to happen a few years hence!

Come on!  Let us listen to what Arjuna says...
-\-
अर्जुन उवाच -
स्थाने हृषीकेश तव प्रकीर्त्या जगत् प्रहृष्यत्यनुरज्यते
रक्षांसि भीतानि दिशो द्रवन्ति सर्वे नमस्यन्ति सिद्धसङ्घाः ३६

Arjuna said:  It is meet, Oh Hrisheekesha, that the world is delighted and rejoices in Thy praise, that Rakshasas fly in fear to all quarters and all the hosts of Siddhas bow down to Thee in adoration.
(XI - 36)

The next eleven shlokams can be called ‘Prayer songs’.  These depict the sight as seen by Arjuna in the Vishwa Roopa Darshan.  Arjuna mentions three persons, the Rakshasa, Ordinary man and Siddha Purusha.  The Rakshasa considers Paramaatman as an enemy.  Hence, he trembles with anger, fear and hatred on hearing the Names, Actions and Qualities of the Paramaatman.  He can not tolerate the Sacred, Holy Names as he himself is impure, wicked and full of sin.  He runs wildly in all direction uon hearing the Names.  Ordinary man enjoys listening to His Names, Attributes and Actions.  He also joins in singing.  He begets Love.  The Siddha Purusha knows Him.  He bows down upon hearing about the Paramaatman.  Arjuna is an ordinary human like us.  He never tires in singing attributes of the Lord.
-\-
कस्माच्च ते नमेरन्महात्मन् गरीयसे ब्राह्मणोsप्यादिकर्त्रे
अनन्त देवेश जगन्निवास त्वमक्षरं सदसत्तत्परं यत् ३७

Oh Infinite Being!  Oh Lord of the Devas, Oh Abode of the universe!  And why should they not, Oh Great-souled One, bow to Thee, greater than, and the Primal Cause of even Brahma?  Thou are the Imperishable, the Being and the non-Being, (as well as) That which is Beyond (them).
(XI - 37)

Who is eligible to recieve ‘namaskara’?  Guru, our parents responsible for our birth, persons higher in age and education, etc should be bowed.  ‘You are Guru of all the Gurus’, says Arjuna.  Guru brightens our inner self.  He causes elimination of the darkness called ignorance.  The Paramaatman is Light.  He resides in us and is the cause for us to know everything.  He was the Guru to Brahma, when Brahma appeared at the origin of creation.  Patanjali Yoga Sutra says, ‘Poorveshaamapi Guruh’ (Yoga Darshan I-26).  Paramaatman is the cause for our birth.  The creator Brahma has been created by Him.  Hence, Arjuna calls him Great Grand Father.  He is eligible for our Namaskara.  In all respects, namely time, place, thing and person, He is boundless.  Hence, Arjuna calls Him Anantha.  He reigns control over the Gods.  He bestows them their unique powers.  Hence, Arjuna calls Him Devesh, the Lord of the Gods.  ‘You are Akshara Swaroopa’ says Arjuna.  Paramaatman is Sat.  Sat is Imperishable.  It is beyond creation, change and destruction.  Everything else is Asat.  Asat has no independant existance.  It is reliant on the Sat.  Thus, You are eligible for Namaskara in every respect.
-\-
त्वमादिदेवः पुरुषः पुराणस्त्वमस्य विश्वस्य परं निधानम्
वेत्ताsसि वेद्यं परं धाम त्वया ततं विश्वमनन्तरूप ॥ ३८

Thou are the Primal Deva, the Ancient Purusha;  Thou are the Supreme Refuge of this universe, Thou are the Knower and the One Thing to be known;  Thou are the Supreme Goal.  By Thee is the universe pervaded, Oh Boundless Form!
(XI - 38)

He is Adideva because He is the Origin, with none, nothing prior to Him.  He is Purana Purusha as He has always been, He is and He will always be.  He is Parama Nidhana as He is bsis for creation, survival and dissolution of the world we know.  He is Vetta, as knower of everything, all the worlds, objects, places and lives and all the times, past, present and future.  He is the One to be known in the Vedas, Puranas, Shastras and by Gyaanis, Sadhus and Mahatmas always.  He is the Ultimate Dhama, Refuge.  (Dhama is Punya Kshetra.  The places offering Moksha).  No one returns from There and there nothing else attainable, no Karma to be performed, nothing else to be known, once That is attained.  He, known Mukti, Parama Pada (the Ultimate position) is Parama Dhama.  He is Ananta Roopa, because He is the multitudes of forms that appeared in the Viraata Cosmic Vision.  He is ‘Twaya Tatam Vishvam’ as the whole world is pervaded by Him alone.  He is in every cell in this world.
-\-
वायुर्यमोग्निर्वरुणः शशाङ्कः प्रजापतिस्त्वं प्रपितामहश्च
नमो नमस्तेस्तु सहस्रकृत्वः पुनश्च भूयोपि नमो नमस्ते ३९
नम: पुरस्तादथ पृष्ठतस्ते नमोस्तु ते सर्वत एव सर्व
अनन्तवीर्यामितविक्रमस्त्वं सर्वं समाप्नोषि ततोसि सर्वः ४०

You are Vayu, Yama, Agni, Varuna, the Moon, Prajapati, and the Great-Grandfather.  Salutation, salutationto Thee, a thousand times, and again and again salutation, salutation to Thee!
Salutation to Thee before and behind, salutation to Thee on every side, Oh All!  Thou, Infinite in power and Infinite in prowess, pervade all;  wherefore Thou art All.
(XI – 39, 40)

Gen. Sundarji was commander-in-Chief of our Army.  He visited Chennai for a programme, while he was still in office.  The venue was Shri Ramakrishna Mission school in T Nagar.  Whole lot of journalists and TV cameramen had gathered.  Gen Sundarji arrived at the venue, but went walking towards a small lane behind the school.  The curious pressmen followed him.  He knocked at the door of small house with tiled roof.  An old man in his eighties, opened the door.  Sundarji fell flat at his feet, unconcerned about the live cameras of TV channels world over.  The old man was his teacher when he studied in the Mission school.  The correspondance of journals and channels in western world expressed surprised at the act of the most powerful person in the world’s second largest army.

Scientist Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam was the President of Bharat.  A felicitation programme was organized in his home-town Ramanathapuram.  He had studied in a village school and had grown to this stature.  On the day of felicitation, he went to his native village and brought his primary school teacher, now an old man in his nineties.  He took him to the felicitation stage, garlanded him, bowed at his feet and offered all success and all the applauds at his feet.

Such scenes are possible only in Bharat.  Namaskara is a beautiful gift of Bharat to this world.  Expression of humility is Namaskara.  Sashtanga Namaskara, falling flat on the ground and touching the feet, is very special.  It symbolizes surrender of body, mind, intellect, speech and everything at his feet.  Doing Namaskara to elders and recieving their blessings on every special occassion;  bowing down before the Idol of God;  falling daily at the feet of parents;  doing Namaskara to the Sun at Sun-rise time;  bowing down mutually on meeting friends and acquaintances;  these have been casual practices in Bharat, carried on since generations.

Even the debts of our parents can be repayed.  But, repayment, compensation of Guru’s blessings is impossible.  We can only bow down before him.  Humility assures his blessings.  His blessings, in return, generates humility.  Arjuna is mellowed by the Grace of Shri krishna.  He bows down.  He bows down again.  He bows down repeatedly.  He calls Shri Krishna by various Names and bows down before Him.
-\-
सखेति मत्वा प्रसभं यदुक्तं हे कृष्ण हे यादव हे सखेति
अजानता महिमानं तवेदं मया प्रमादात्प्रणयेन वापि ४१
यच्चावहासार्थमसत्कृतोsसि विहारशय्यासनभोजनेषु
एकोsथवाप्यच्युत तत्समक्षं तत्क्षामये त्वामहमप्रमेयम् ४२

Whatever I have presumptuously said from carelessness or love, addressing Thee as ‘Oh Krishna, Oh Yadava, Oh Friend,’ regarding Thee merely as a friend, unconscious of this Thy greatness – in whatever way I may have been disrespectful to Thee in fun, while walking, reposing, sitting, or dining, when alone (with Thee), Oh Achyuta!  or in company – I implore Thee, Immeasurable One, to forgive all this.
(XI – 41, 42)

Arjuna ws a very close friend of Shri Krishna.  He has indulged in teasing, playing and making fun with Shri Krishna.  We can not know the real strength of Bhagawan.  However, Arjuna knew, if not a bit of Shri Krishna’s power.  Otherwise, he would not have chosen weapon-less Shri Krishna instead of one akshouhini army offered to him.  His friendship probably prompted him to do so.

Arjuna had related with Him as Shri Krishna, as a friend, as a milkman, as a cowherd boy.  Now, he realized the Divinity in Him and speaks these words on knowing that.  Not only Shri Krishna, all the lives in this world are forms of the Divine.  We misbahave with them or disregard them out of igborance of their Divinity.  We behave rudely with our wives, parents, servants.  We disrespect them.  We abuse them.  We must develop clarity in our thoughts and must be able to appreciate and respect them.  We must relate with the creation of the God with worshipful respect.  Reaching Him is definitely not possible through mere intellectual activity.  Yet, intellectual clarity is the first step towards Him.

Kanchi Paramacharya tells a story.  A king banished his son, the prince for being irresponsible and wayward.  The prince roamed around, begged for food and lived a nomadic life.  Ten years were lost.  The king repented his action and commanded the minister to search for the prince.  The prince was in a town, with shabby clothes, without shoes in his feet.  His feet had developed boils and cracks due to the heat.  He wanted to buy shoes and begged for paltry sums.  Some gave and some refused.  Some sympathised with him and some made fun of him.  At that very moment, the minister came by the way looking for the prince.  He identified this beggar as the prince.  He fell at his feet and asked for excuse on behalf of the king.  He requested the prince to alight the chariot.  Those who refused money to the prince and made fun of him, not knowing him as prince, were all at his feet begging to be excused for the wrong behaviour.  Swami Vivekananda calls the poor ‘Daridra Narayana’.  He wants us not be rude with servants and the poor.  If we could do so, there won’t be a necessity to ask for forgivance on realizing Divinity in all.
-\-
पितासि लोकस्य चराचरस्य त्वमस्य पूज्यश्च गुरूर्गरीयान्
त्वत्समोsस्त्यभ्यधिकः कुतोsन्यो लोकत्रयेsप्यप्रतिमप्रभाव ४३

You are the Father of the world, moving and unmoving;  the object of its worship; greater than the great.  None exists there who is equal to Thee in the three worlds;  who, then can excel Thee, Oh You, of power incomparable?
(XI - 43)

He is the Father of all the mobile and immobile objects and lives in the world, as He is  the origin of the creation of all these.  Shri Krishna says (XVII-4) ‘Aham Beejapradah Pitaa’.  I am the Seed-giver and hence Father of all the lives.  All the glories are His and hence He is worshipful to all.  He is the Knower, knows everything.  He presides over the act of knowing.  He is the One to be known.  The Knower of everything (Omniscient) is known by His own light.  Hence, He is the Guru of all the Gurus, the Mahaguru.  He is the Highest, the greatest.  When there is none and nothing equal to Him, then how can there be anyone or anything greater than Him?  He is the Only One presiding over all the moments and activities in this universe.  If there were more than one, there would have been confusion.  If one created and the other decides to destroy?  We infer that the Boss has to be One, because there is order, coordinated and a method in the movements, activities of infinite number of objects and lives in the Universe.
-\-
तस्मात्प्रणम्य प्रणिधाय कायं प्रसादये त्वामहमीशमीड्यम्
पितेव पुत्रस्य सखेव ख्युः प्रियः प्रियायार्हसि देव सोढुम् ४४

So prostrating my body in adoration, I crave Thy forgiveness, Lord adorable!  As a father forgives his son, friend dear friend, a beloved one his love, even so should Thou forgive me, O Deva.
(XI - 44)

Man’s emotional status when he is angry or when he is arrogant is exactly the reverse of the status when he is humble, when he seeks pardon.  The emotions in mind causes certain impacts on the body.  These impacts are natural, spontaneous and involuntary.  Mankind has also developed body signs or body language to express these emotions.  He rubs the palms against each other when he is doubt.  He holds his head on his palm when worry troubles him.  Similarly, when uncontrollable anger for someone raises in mind, he wishes to crush him with his hands or under his feet.  He expresses this anger by showing his chappal or by abusive words.  Seeking forgivance and becoming humble is the opposite emotion.  This emotion is expressed in Bharat by placing one’s own head voluntarily at the other’s feet.  This is Pranipadam.
-\-
अदृष्टपूर्वं हृषितोsस्मि दृष्ट्वा भयेन प्रव्यथितं मनो मे
तदेव मे दर्शय देव रूपं प्रसीद देवश जगन्निवास ४५

Overjoyed am I to have seen what I saw never before;  yet my mind, is distracted with terror.  Show me, Oh Deva! only that Form of Yours (The four-armed one).  Have mercy, Oh Lord of Devas!  Oh Abode of the universe!
(XI - 45)

The basis for the subject in the next chapter is laid in this shlokam.  Arjuna ‘saw’ the Formless.  But, he could not stay fixed on the abstract, Formless attribute of the Lord.  He demands Form.  Form, obviously gives rise to duals, beautiful Form and ugly Form, terrific Form and gentle Form, Form liked by the mind and a Form disliked by the mind.  Arjuna asks the Lord to appear in a For.  How should the Form be?  He describes in the next shlokam.
-\-
किरीटिनं गदिनं चक्रहस्तमिच्छामि त्वां द्रष्टुमहं तथैव
तेनैव रूपेण चतुर्भुजेन सहस्रबाहो भव विश्वमूर्ते ४६

Diademed, bearing a Mace (Gada) and a Discus (Chakra), Thee I desire to as before.  Assume that same four-armed Form, Oh Thou of a thousand arms, of universal Form!
(XI - 46)

“You must carry Your Shankh (Conch), Gada (Mace) and Chakra (Discus).  You must wear Your dazzling Crown on Your head.  You must come in Your Four-armed Form.  Allow me to see you in this Form,” pleads Arjuna.  Worship of Form is a powerful system.  Inspite of severe propaganda against Idol-worship, it is not going to fade away.  It is most suitable to man’s nature.  The preachers of Advaita and worship of the abstract were not opposed to Idol worship.  Many of them worshipped a Form themselves.  Aadi Shankara is he most glorious advocate of Adwaita.  He also stood with folded hands in the Sannidhi of innumerable temples and sang beautiful hymns in praise of the deity there.  He has even idolized the rivers Ganga, Narmada and Kaveri and sung hymns on them.  Shri Ramkrishna Paramahamsa talked Vedanta, yet performed worship of Mother Kali till his last breath.  Shri Mahaveer and Gautam Buddha rejected Idols and condemned worship of forms.  Their own disciples turned them into Idols and Buddha Viharas and Jain temples meant for meditation on the abstract have become temples with Idols of Gautam Buddha and Mahaveer.  I have visited a few Viharas in Shri Lanka, which have Idols of Mahavishnu, Lakshmi, Ganapati along with the Idol of Gautam Buddha.  Ramaswamy Naicker indulged lifelong in breaking Idols, slapping the Idols with broomsticks and insulting Idols by placing garland of shoes on those.  Now, his statues all over Tamil Nadu and his samadhi have become worship sites, worship being conducted not with shoes, chappals, brooms and hammers but with flowers and scented sticks.  You do not want believe!  Try to enter the samadhi with your Chappals and you will know.
-\-
श्री भगवानुवाच -
मया प्रसन्नेन तवार्जुनेदं रूपं परं दर्शितमात्मयोगात्
तेजोमयं विश्वमनन्तमाद्यं यन्मे त्वदन्येन दृष्टपूर्वम् ४७

The Blessed Lord said:  Graciously have I shown to thee, Oh Arjuna!  this Form supreme, by My own Yogik power, this resplendent, primeval, infinite, universal Form of Mine, which has not been seen before by anyone else.
(XI - 47)

‘None has seen this Form of mine’ says Shri Krishna.  Has Yashoda not seen?  A doubt may rise in us.  Yashoda did not see this gory, terrific Form.  She merely got to see a vision to show that ‘the whole world rests in Me’.  The Form He showed in the court of the Kauravas, was a result of anger and not grace or blessing.  That was also not the complete Form.  That is why He says ‘no one has seen this Viraata Form’.  Now, there was one more who got to see this form.  He is Sanjaya.  That is why we could get a glimpse of the vision throrugh the Gita as narrated by Sanjaya.

 As I was pleased I blessed you with this vision.  It was due to My Grace that you could see Me in this Form.  Without His Grace, our qualification, our devotion, our efforts, etc. are inept in offering this great vision to us.  His Grace can not be measured.  It is boundless.  We bind His Grace by attributing petty achievements to His Grace.  ‘I enjoyed a great Satsanga due to His Grace’ we have heard some say.  His Grace is not to be enjoyed.  If enjoyed, anything binds.  The seeker has to keep away from Sattvika pleasures also.
-\-
वेद यज्ञाध्ययनैर्न दानैर्न क्रियाभिर्न तपोभिरुग्रैः
एवं रूपः शक्य अहं नृलोके द्रष्टुं त्वदन्येन कुरुप्रवीर ४८

Neither by the study of the Veda and Yagnya, nor by gifts, nor by rituals, nor by severe austerities, am I seen in such Form, in the world of men, by any other than thee, Oh great hero of the Kurus.
(XI - 48)

Vishva Roopa Darshanam is impossible by the study of Veda, Yagya and Daana.  These are done with an alive ‘I’, with total faith and reliance on ‘I’.  Resolution that ‘I do’ is predominant in all these.  Arjuna was blessed with Vishva Roopa Darshana by ‘Surrender’ and devotion.  Shri Ramkrishna Paramahamsa says, “A river could be crossed in two ways.  The one is self effort.  Row the boat yourself.  The other involves waiting.  Wait for the favourable wind.  Raise the mast and allow the wind to carry the boat.  The wind filling up the mast takes the boat”.  Arjuna allowed his boat to be carried by the wind called Shri Krishna.  In Yoga Sadhana, one can know self to be the Paramaatman.  One can become Shri Krishna through the Yoga Sadhana.  Gautam Buddha became Shri Krishna.  Mahaveer became Him.  They saw the real Self through their own resolution and effort.  Becoming an Arjuna may be difficult.  He did not resolve to search for Self.  He merely surrendered at the feet of one who has searched and found out Self.
-\-
मा ते व्यथा मा विमूढभावो दृष्ट्वा रूपं घोरमीदृङ्ममेदम्
व्यपेतभीः प्रीतमनाः पुबस्त्वं तदेव मे रूपमिदं प्रपश्य ४९

Be not afraid nor bewildered, having beheld this Form of Mine, so terrific.  With thy tears dispelled and with gladdened heart, now see again this (former) Form of Mine.
(XI - 49)

He listens to the prayer of a devotee.  The prayers are fulfilled.  Arjuna’s prayer was listened to and the Lord changed to Chatur-Bhuja Form.  But, how are our prayers?  Inconsistent, at times, contradictory.  A woman prayed for marrage.  She wanted, ‘a complete Man, a man like lion, who would always listen to her words’.  He should be a lion as well as a lamb, appearance like a lion and behaviour like a lamb!  Impossible prayers!

We might have heard the Russian story.  God sanctioned three boons to a man.  He was always dissatisfied with his nose.  He feltit was out of shape.  So he said, “I want shapely nose on my face and nothing else”.  Instantly, he got noses all around his face.  He was bewildered.  “No.  I do not want nose”.  All the noses disappeared.  There was no nose in his face.  He lost the second boon in this.  He was sad.  “Let me have my previous face, as it was before tou offered those boons”.  He regained his original face.  He did not gain anything, but lost all the three boons.  The Pramaatman is obliging.  He accedes to our Prarthana.  Should we waste the Prarthana, potent enough to fetch us great things by demanding petty things?  ‘No demads’ is the highest Prarthana.
-\-
सञ्जय उवाच -
इत्यर्जुनं वासुदेवस्तथोक्त्वा स्वकं रूपं दर्शयामास भूयः
आश्वासयामास भीतमेनं भूत्वा पुनः सौम्यवपुर्महात्मा ५०

Sanjaya said:  So Vasudeva, having thus spoken to Arjuna, showed again His own Form;  and the Great-souled One, assuming His gentle Form, pacified him who was terrified.
(XI - 50)

Sanjaya, who had been calling Him Paramaatman, calls Him now Mahatman.  What is the difference?  Paramaatman does not act to our desires.  We have to the way He lays for us.  The Mahatma comes on our was, to our desire, if only to enthuse us, console us and inspire us.  Mahatma is a more favourable form of the Paramaatman.  There is a sentence in an old Hebrew book, Abraham Hailis.  “God is not your uncle.  He is not nice.  God is an earthquake”.  One who is prepared to lose self can reach Him.  that is why, Shri Krishn is called Poorna Avatara, the Complete Avatara.  He was not here only for favourable actions.  Actions not relished by us, not comprehended by us, are also His.  Many of His actions give rise to questions, sometimes embarrassing to us.  Yes.  He is complete and we are defective.  That is the reason for our incomprehension or embarrassment.

Shri Krishna showed His Chatur-Bhuja Form, as requeted by Arjuna.  Then, He returned to normal human form.  Arjuna is blessed and fortunate, no doubt.  He enjoyed thick friendship with Shri Krishna in His human form.  He saw the Cosmic Viraata Form.  He also saw the Chatur-Bhuja Form, difficult even for the gods to see.  He demanded to see these Forms and shri Krishna smilingly acceded.  His simple, transparent and child-like mind is the reason for this fortune.

The Gyaani and the Yogee never demand.  They accept everything as it is.  They change themselves according to the need.  But, the devotee is not ready to make slightest change in self.  ‘I can not.  I am too incapable, inept and weak’ he says.  He demands the Paramaatman to change.  He commands Him to appear in a desired Form.  The surprise is that the Paramaatman accedes to the devotee’s demand.  That is the strength of Love and Devotion.

Shri Tulasidas wrote the Ramayana in Hindi.  He visited Brindavan, the field of action of Shri Krishna.  He visited the Shri Krishna Temple and saw Shri krishna with His Flute.  He demanded the Form of Shri Rama with His Bow Kodanda.  He refused to bow down unless his demand was met.  Shri Krishna agreed to his demand and appeared before him as Kodanda Rama.

There is Kartha Bhava (I am the doer) when one says I change myself.  This is subtle ego.  Many Yogees and Gyaanis retain this Sattvika Ahankara.  The devotee is surrendered.  He regards himself as a zero.  He feels he is incapable and impotent of any initiative.  ‘You accept me as I am.  If there is a need, You change accordingly’.  This is not an arrogant demand.  This is not based on ego.  It is on the other hand possible due to total surrender.

There lived a Sadhu in the outskirts of a village.  If he was invited for food, he would say, “I won’t come.  If you wish, you bring the food”.  If the food was brought to him, he would say, “Who will eat this?  If you so wish, you feed in my mouth”.  The people called him a lunatic and lazy.  Yet, he was forcefully fed now and then.  Once, the village faced severe draught and scarcity of food.  People did not have enough to eat.  They would neither allow him to die of starving.  They decide to give him a religious burial alive and conveyed the decision to him.  “I will not come.  Who will walk all the way to burial ground?  If you want me to be buried, you carry me there.  The people made the carriage, carried and laid him on the carriage.  He did not say anything.  They carried him on the carriage.  On the way, a landlord of the next village came by.  ‘Who is dead?’ he enquired.  He was agitated when he knew the facts.  He announced a donation of grains to feed him the whole year.  The people kept the carriage on the ground and went away.  He kept lying there.  The landlord came to him and requested him to return to his place of stay.  ‘Who will walk all the way?  Let those who carried me to this place carry me back”.  We also may call him a lunatic when we read this.  You call him mad, who appears to be lunatic.  If he gets angry, he should be mad.  If he remains calm, he should be asiddha purusha.
-\-
अर्जुन उवाच -
दृष्ट्वेदं मानुषं रूपं तव सौम्यं जनार्दन
दानीमस्मि संवृत्तः सचेताः प्रकृतिं तः ५१

Arjuna said:  Having seen this Thy gentle human Form, Oh Janardana, my thoughts are now composed and I am restored to my nature.
(XI - 51)

We might have read the life of Prahlada.  The Paramaatman took the form of Narasimha (man with face and arms of a lion) and killed Hiranyakashipu.  Hiranyakshipu had a boon protecting him from death by a man or a beast, by a hand-weapon or missile, on the ground or in sky.  Shri Vishnu took a Form which was neither man nor beast, carried him on His lap which was neither ground nor sky, killed him by tearing off his stomach using the sharp nails in His lion-arms.  This was a terrifying sight.  Added to this was His furious face, furious because of the tortures His devotee Prahlada was subjected to by Hiranyakashipu.  Narasimha was seated with blood-soaked body of Hiranyakashipu on His lap, blood-dripping from His drawn out tongue, wearing the long intestine of Hiranyakashipu as garland around His neck and roaring as lion.  There prevailed a frightening atmosphere there.  The heat of His fury spread all around adding to the discomfiture of Gods around.  The Gods, including Mother Lakshmi, knew Narasimha was a Form of Shri Vishnu.  Yet, none of them dared to go near Him.  They wanted Him to calm down.  The child devotee Prahlada went near Him and sat on His lap.  Narasimha was full of affection for this child.  He calmed down and started licking Prahlada affectionately on his face.

If such was the plight of the Gods?  Arjuna was a ordinary human.  He says, “I returned to normalcy after You returned to Your normal human Form.  My fear is gone”.

‘I returned to normalcy’, says Arjuna.  Then, which state had he been to?  Where did he return from?  He had been to a state, hidden deep within, hitherto unknown to him.  That was not his normal state.  That was a state which burst forth in an extra-ordinary situation.  We hear people say, “Did he do this?  It is unbelivable” or “Usually, he is not like this” or “I have never seen him like this.  I do not know where was this personality hidden in him”.  We all have the usual face, known to all, in normal situations.  A different face, unknown to all, unknown even to self, shows up in extra-ordinary situations.  Anyone is put to test only in extra-ordinary situations.  He is a unique personality who has the same face in all planes.
-\-
श्री भगवानुवाच -
सुदुर्दर्शमिदं रूपं दृष्टवानसि यन्मम
देवा अप्यस्य रूपस्य नित्यं दर्शनकांक्षिणः ५२

The Blessed Lord said:  Very hard indeed it is to see this Form of Mine which thou hast seen.  Even the Devas ever long to behold this Form.
(XI - 52)

Sudurdarsham, mentioned by Shri Krishna is not the Cosmic Form but the Chatur-bhuja Form.  This Form is peaceful.  It is an expression total Love.  The sight of Chaturbhuja Form is rare, very rare to get.  Arjuna requested for it and Shri Krishna acceded.  The impact of a devastating experience on the psyche is very deep.  It is carried for the rest of life.  The personality, a combination of thoughts, speech and action, is affected.  Psychiatrists say chronic headache, stomachache etc. are results of a terrifying experience.  If the impact of the experience on the psyche is to erased, he must experience a lot of love and affection.  Gujarat suffered an earthquake on 26th January – 2001.  We, a group of friends visited the affected areas in the third week of February.  We organized games in the evenings and story-telling and other competitions in the noons.  Around thousand children participated in the drawing competition.  Almost eight hundred drawings had the tri-colour flag, a dead body and a shattered building.  (In fact, we had not suggested any theme for the competition.  We had merely given white sheets and a set of colour pencils).  The deep scar left in the tender minds could be gauged by us.  This disappears in a few years in course of time or  in a shorter period by showering a lot of love and concern.

Arjuna experienced tremendous fear on seeing the Viraata Cosmic Form.  There could have been many reasons for his fear.  Realization of the truth that the Paramaatman is the cause of destruction;  Realizing that the enemies will be killed in the battle not by ‘my’ valour and brave fight, but because their death is already destined by the Paramaatman;  Sight of the tormenting scene of death; etc.  This fear has to be erased from depth of the heart.  He needed a soothing shower of love.  He needed an affectionate hug.  That is why, he was blessed with Chatur-Bhuja darshana.

Man rests assured with a sense of being protected by the God with the thought that God is many times more powerful than himself.  God with four arms is born out of this thought.  The love experienced when embraced by four arms should be many times higher than when embraced by two armed man.  A white friend of mine said, “Your God Forms in temples have beautiful eyes.  They penetrate and cause inexplicable impact inside me”.  I had never noticed this till then.  I asked a few Sthapatis about the way these idols are cast.  (Sculptors casting worldly forms are called shilpis and those casting Idols of God are Sthapatis).  They undertake severe disciplines and austerities while making Idols.  Especially, eyes are carved with lot of devotion.  Eyes are supposed to be Prana or life of the Idols.  The opening of eyes is very special ritual in installation of Idols in temples.  We expect His eyes to shower many times more affection and Love on us, than any human eyes can.  Arjuna, trembling in fear does not ask for Shri Krishna’s return to His normal two-armed human form.  He requests to see His four-armed affectionate Form.  ‘Neither thousand armed terrorizing Form, nor two-armed casual form, but four-armed Form with smiling face, lovely eyes, affectionate and soothing look’.  That was the antidote for the fear caused in his mind.
-\-
नाहं वेदैर्न तपसा दानेन चेज्यया
शक्य एवंविधो द्रष्टुं दृष्टवानसि मां यथा ५३

Neither by Vedas, nor by austerity, nor by gifts, nor by sacrifice can I be seen as thou hast seen Me.
(XI - 53)

‘I can not be seen through the Vedas’.  The ones prejudiced against the Vedas pleased on hearing Shri Krishna say this.  There are two persons.  One never entered the school, never learnt anything.  He is soaked in ignorance.  The other finished school and college education and went for further education.  He completed highest level of education.  He realises that he does not know anything, inspite of so much education.  On hearing this, the first man says, “I knew this.  That is why I never studied.  Education is all mere waste”.  He is ignorant.  The second man also says he does not know anything.  Are these two equals?  Is what the two mean same?  The ignorance of the first is due to lack of any effort, while that of the later is after great effort has been put in and born out of experience.  He realises his ignorance.  He realises futility of all his education in making him know.  The realisation is due to his humility that what he learnt is nothing and what is left to be learned is vast.  That the most educated says this does not mean education is waste and unnecessary.  He has been able to realise his ignorance because and after he studied.  One who knows his ignorance is wise and one who regards self as knowledgeable, is the greatest fool.

We should not take this as a comment against the Vedas.  The Vedas can fetch us other things, not the Paramaatman.  That is the truth and has been corroborated by Upanishads, integral parts of the Vedas.  Similarly Daana, Tapas, Yagya also are inept in seeing the Paramaatman.

If we think these are instruments in attaining Him, we probably reduce Him to a matter of business.  ‘I give this much rupees.  Give me that object’.  That is business.  ‘I do this.  Make Yourself visible to me’.  Is the Paramaatman a purchaseable product?  If He is, what will be the cost we can bear to get Him?  He is the One who created this huge, infinite Universe by His mere wish.  What can be the possible cost offered by ‘me’, a speck in this huge, huge universe.  That is why He says, ‘this Chaturbhuja Form is not seen with the help of Vedas or Daana or Tapas or Yagya’.
-\-
भक्त्या त्वनन्यया शक्य अहं एवं विधोर्जुन
ज्ञातुं द्रष्टुञ्च तत्त्वेन प्रवेष्टुं परन्तप ५४

But by the single-minded devotion I may in this Form, be known, Oh Arjuna!  and seen in reality, and also entered into, Oh scorcher of foes.
(XI - 54)

Shri Krishna mentions three steps in this shlokam.  Gyaatum (to know);  Drashtum (to see);  Praveshtum (to reach).  The Veda and Dharma Shastra help in knowing.  Self-Introspection, Analytical thinking and Dhyaana help us to see.  Reaching is achieved by dissolving ‘me’.  Ananya Bhakti is attained by all these three steps together.

Ananya Bhakti is extolled again and again in the Gita.  Anya is other.  Ananya is ‘none other’.  Ananya Bhakti on the Paramaatman is devotion to Him, love for Him, without any thought on anything else.  Is ananya bhakti then ‘rejection of wife, children and worldly relationships, neglect of society, disregard for money and objects and establishment of absolute devotion to the Paramaatman?  Once a friend of mine came to me and said, “After I listened to your lecture, I knew the body is perishable.  Whenever I see my daughter, a thought that ‘she is bound to die’ comes to my mind.  I develop fear the next moment”.  (In olden days, the disciple was selected after tough trials and tests, only to avoid such perverted understanding.)  “Why do you look at your daughter?  Why not look at your own body and feel that the body is perishable?” I asked him.  Such is the intelligence of humans.  He never wants to even glance at his destruction.  He does not like to take the slightest hint on his own death.

Is this the meaning of ananya bhakti?  Hating the world and wanting to get Him?  Hostility with the world and friendship and love for Him?  The expectation of Shri Krishna can never be this.  The world is born from Him, created by His Maya.  Anyone hating His creation can never find a spot in His heart.  ‘Find Him in the world.  He is the Lover.  The object of Love is also His.  You remove yourself from the scene.  There is necessity to reject wife and children.  Tune your attitude.  Now you regard them as ‘mine’.  Transform this outlook to ‘They are His manifested Forms’.  Let Love continue.  The 38th shlokam says ‘He is anantaroopa’.  He has innumerable Forms.  Love them as very forms of the Paraman.  That is ananya bhakti.  No hatred towards the world.  No rejection of the world.  Love continues but the lover ‘me’ is removed and the possessive feeling about the loved ones considering them as ‘mine’ is eliminated.

There is an ahankara or ego involved in the feeling that ‘I love’ or ‘these are my beloved’.  The expectation for favourable response is born.  Disappointment, anger and hatred grow if the response from the beloveds is not favourable.  Now, the Love changes into contempt. But, if love radiates like flower radiates scent or a tree produces cool shadow, then love takes the form of bhakti.  The flower never attaches with those who enjoy its smell or the tree does not resolve to give shadow and shelter only to ‘my’ people who ‘water my roots’.  The flower does not consider the smell as ‘mine’, neither the tree takes the shadow as ‘mine’.  Love showered considering all as His Forms is Ananya Bhakti.

This seems to be very difficult.  That is why Shri Krishna says it is almost impossible to see Me.  The Vedas can be studied.  Yagyas can be performed.  Toughest austerities can be practised.  But, attaining this sight by which everything is seen and loved as the Paramaatman, is very difficult and rare.
-\-
मत्कर्मकृन्मत्परमो मद्भक्त: सङ्गवर्जितः
निर्वैरः सर्वभूतेषु यः मामेति पाण्दव ५५

He who does work for Me alone and has Me for his goal, is devoted to Me, is freed from attachment, and bears enmity towards no creature – he enters into Me, Oh Pandava.
(XI - 55)

He further elaborates ‘ananya bhakti’  in this shlokam.  “Work for Me’;  ‘Have Me as your ultimate goal’;  ‘detached and without hatred in heart’ such a devotee is destined to reach Me.”  Whenever He mentions Raaga (attachment) he also mentions dwesha (hatred or dislike) as these two are twins, opposite faces of the one and the same coin.  One is if the other is.  One can not be if the other is not.  If anyone says, “I have attachment, I have likes.  But, I do not have an iota of dislike or hatred for anyone or anything” he is lying.  When he expresses like for one object or person, his dislike for something or some other person is latent.  The object being liked by him today may itself become an object of his hatred tomorrow.

Whom should one work for?  It is lowly to work for self, one’s own belly.  It is ordinary to work for others, the king, the job-giver, the government, an organization, society etc.  To work for Him is superior.  There is story of three sculptors.  Three sculptors had been hired by a king to create statues of elephant to be placed in a majestic temple, proposed to be built by the king.  One worked for his belly.  He is unhappy.  He detests the work assigned to him.  He hates the king.  He hates the chisel in his hands.  He curses the stone being carved into sculpture.  He is irritated if the next person sings in joy.  He hates the sun for showering heat.  He even hates his life, the fate which forced him to this task.  His inner self is filled with hatred, anger and grief.

The second sculptor shapes his sculpture for the boss or the job-giver.  He desires to receive appreciation and further jobs from the boss.  He is anxious.  He is restless.  He is enthusiastic at times and irritated at other times.

The third sculptor shapes the sculpture for the Paramaatman.  He is full of peace, joy, and contentment.  The work is same.  The instrument like chisel is the same.  The stone is the same.  Sun and other factors around are same.  The boss is the same.  But, the mind set of the three are different.

What is to be attained?  There are three types here too.  Those who seek and attain objects are the first type.  ‘I have to build my house’;  ‘Buying a vehicle is my goal’;  ‘I have to acquire these comfort gadget’; etc.  They are always in discontent and hence unhappy.  They are also in a hurry and hence restless.  This type is low.  The second type are those who have name, fame, position, etc. as the ultimate goal.  They are ready to sacrifice comforts for achieving that.  They live a life of excited and enthusiastic activity.  They face disappointments.  All these for name, fame, position etc.  They are the ordinary or middle type.  The third type are those who target reaching the Parmatman.  They live a peaceful, contented and joyous life.  When we say He is to be reached, it gives a feeling as if He is somewhere else and has to be reached through our efforts.  He is not somewhere else.  He is within us.  In fact, our real identity is Him.  We have forgotten that and are lost.  The moment we realize this, we are one with Him.  The third type live to know this and are the superior type.

What should be our object of devotion?  It can not be the world.  World can be an object of attachment and never devotion.  We wish to enslave the world.  Gradually, we ourselves are enslaved by the world.  There can neither be devotion towards the slave in the boss or towards the boss in the slave.  Authority on the slave and fear for the boss are possible, not devotion.  Can there be devotion to ‘self’?  One may be plunged in ‘self-praise’ ever singing the greatness of own qualities, talents, achievements etc.  There may be a few cronies around, benefitting from him, who join in this.  But there are many others in the field singing self-praise.  Hence, competition, comparison, jealousy, haterd, fear etc. become inevitable products.  Where is the space for devotion?  Devotion to a great individual, a noble personality is possible.  But, that can not be parmanent and non-changing.  It will erase the moment some defect, short coming is exposed in him.  He is not permanent.  He has to go.  Devotion shrinks or diverts to someone else or something else after his death.  Permanent Bhakti, Never-deminishing Bhakti, no-expectations Bhakti is possible only on the Paramaatman.

Actions for Him (Matkarma), Goal is Him (Matparama), Devotion on Him (Madbhakta) one with such an attitude is also sanga-vivarjitha and nirvaira (without attachment and hatred), he will reach Me.
-\-

\ तत्सदिति श्रीमद्भगवद्गीतासु उपनिषत्सु ब्रह्मविद्यायां योगशास्त्रे श्रीकृष्णार्जुन सम्वादे विश्वरूप दर्शन योगो योगो नाम एकादशोsध्यायः

Thus concludes ‘Vishva Roopa Darshana Yog’, the eleventh chapter in the grand dialogue between Shree Krishna and Arjuna, called the Shreemad Bhagawad Geetha, which is verily an Upanishad, elaborating on ‘The Divine Knowledge’ and also describing the ‘Way to Godhood’.
\\\\\ HARIH OM TAT SAT \\\\\

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The BHOGI West Versus YOGI East (1)

ॐ (This is Copy Paste of one of my books. The book was written in my personal diary way back in 2000, during my first visit and stay in South Africa. It was later printed and published in 2012. Niraamay Publication, Nagpur. Rs. 20/-) My words, before you read...... This book may also be titled ‘INDIA versus BHARAT’. These two names indicate two mindsets.  India wants to deny Bharat, but can not, as that is Her real identity.  Bharat has never been against change and modernization.  Modernization should not be a garb for Westernization or Americanization.  In fact, Westernization may be a wrong term, as every state in Europe is in search of its identity or roots. I emphasize again that two states, America and Bharat are not being compared and contrasted.  Two mindsets are being compared.  There is no intention to brand one as superior and the other as inferior.  The two are products of their respective attitudes.  One sees what is perceivable through senses and rejects

கீதையில் சில சொற்றொடர்கள் - 31

ॐ கீதையில் சில சொற்றொடர்கள் - 31 चातुर्वर्ण्यं मया सृष्टं गुण कर्म विभागशः  ... (अध्याय ४ - श्लोक १३) சாதுர்வர்ண்யம் மயா ஸ்ருஷ்டம் குண கர்ம விபாகஶஹ்  ...  (அத்யாயம் 4 - ஶ்லோகம் 13) Chatur VarNyam Mayaa Srushtam GuNa Karma Vibhaagashah ... (Chapter 4 - Shlokam 13) அர்தம் :   சாதுர் வர்ண்யம் மயா ஸ்ருஷ்டம்... குண கர்ம விபாகஶ :   குணம் மற்றும் கர்மங்களின் அடிப்படையில் நான்கு வர்ணங்கள் என்னலே படைக்கப் பட்டது. சாதுர் வர்ண்யம் மயா ஸ்ருஷ்டம்... குண கர்ம விபாகஶ :  சதுர் வர்ணங்களை, நான்கு வர்ணங்களை நான்தான் ஸ்ருஷ்டித்தேன், என்கிறார் ஸ்ரீ க்ருஷ்ணன்.  இதில் என்ன ஆஶ்சர்யம் ??  ப்ரக்ருதியில் உள்ள அனைத்துமே அவர் படைத்தவை என்னும்போது, சதுர் வர்ணங்களையும் அவர்தானே படைத்திருக்க வேண்டும் ??  கீதையின் இந்த வாக்யம் நாஸ்திகவாதிகள், கம்யூனிஸ்ட்கள், கடவுள் மறுப்பு இயக்கத்தினர் என்று கடவுளை ஏற்காதவர்களையும் நெளிய வைக்கிறது.  கடவுளே படைத்திருக்கிறார் என்றால் அதை அழித்தொழிக்க முடியாது என்று கருதுகிறார்களா ??  இவர்கள் அனைவரும் ஜாதி அமைப்பை எதிர்க்கிறார்கள்.  அதுவே ஹிந்து ஸமுதாயத்தின் அனைத்து

ஜ, ஷ, ஸ, ஹ, க்ஷ, ஸ்ரீ ....

ॐ ஜ , ஷ , ஸ , ஹ , ஶ , க்ஷ , ஸ்ரீ என்ற எழுத்துக்களை வடமொழி எழுத்துக்கள் என்கிறான் ஒருவன். ஸம்ஸ்க்ருத எழுத்து என்கிறான் ஒருவன் . மூடர்கள் .  அறியாமையில் பேசுகின்றனர் . தவறான நோக்கத்துடன், நம்முள் பேதத்தை ஏற்படுத்திட எவனோ புதைத்துச் சென்ற விஷத்தை , அது விஷம் என்று கூட அறியாமல் பேசுகின்றனர் . வட என்பது திஶை . திஶைக்கு மொழி கிடையாது . (இசைக்கும் மொழி கிடையாது . கவிதைக்குதான் மொழி . தமிழிசை மன்றம் என்பதெல்லாம் அபத்தம் .) தமிழகத்திற்கு வடக்கில் பாரத தேஶத்தின் அத்தனை ப்ராந்தங்களும் (கேரளம் தவிர்த்து) உள்ளன . தெலுங்கு , மராடீ , போஜ்புரி , குஜராதீ ... அனைத்து மொழிகளும் வட திஶையில் பேசப்படும் மொழிகள் .  இவை எல்லாம் வடமொழிகள் . (கன்யாகுமரி ஆளுக்கு சென்னை பாஷை கூட வடமொழிதான்) . இந்த எல்லா மொழிகளிலும் இந்த ஶப்தங்களுக்கு எழுத்துக்கள் உண்டு .   தெலுங்கில் జ  , స  , హ .. . என்றும் ,   கன்னடத்தில்   ಜ , ಸ , ಹ , ಕ್ಷ .. என்றும் , மராடீயில் . ज , स , ह , श , क्ष,.. என்றும் குஜராதியில்     જ , સ , હા , ક્ષ  , என்றும் ,   பெங்காலியில் জ  ,   স , হা  , ক্ষ ... என்றும் ஹிந்தியில் ज , स , ह ,